<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Trading-EZ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trading-ez.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trading-ez.com</link>
	<description>Online money making opportunities of the Internet by trading the forex foreign currencies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Construction of Indirect Sales Channels</title>
		<link>http://www.trading-ez.com/the-construction-of-indirect-sales-channels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trading-ez.com/the-construction-of-indirect-sales-channels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expansion stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales teams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trading-ez.com/the-construction-of-indirect-sales-channels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A CEO recently asked me for my thoughts on our sales process and building indirect channels. He asked me to describe my opinions on the best practices in channel development for his SaaS company, particularly techniques to dealing with channel conflict, revenue sharing policies and sales incentives. Let me start off with the reply&#8230; My...</p><p><strong><a href="http://www.trading-ez.com/the-construction-of-indirect-sales-channels/">Read the rest of this entry</a></strong></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A CEO recently asked me  for my thoughts on our <a href="http://blog.openviewpartners.com" target="_blank">sales process</a> and building indirect channels.  He asked  me to describe my opinions  on the best practices in channel development  for his SaaS company, particularly techniques to dealing with channel  conflict,  revenue sharing policies and sales incentives.</p>
<p>Let me  start off with the reply&#8230; My guidance would be not to invest too much time  and energy on creating a reseller channel. The reseller channel  normally does not do the job for SaaS companies, specifically at the early stages (sub-$20M in revenue). This is driven by two things:</p>
<ol>
<li>SaaS  solutions generally don&#8217;t require an intermediary. They are straightforward to discover (online), easy to implement (nothing to deploy), and easy to use. This  is certainly not the case with SaaS solutions that require a  vital process adjustment on the customer&#8217;s side,  more  on that  below.</li>
<li>SaaS license revenue stream in  the first year ( when  the reseller should make the most of his  money) is a portion of what perpetual license products receive. So the  reseller  needs  to settle for a portion of the money he expects  from his perpetual license vendors, or he must receive a cut of  subsequent year subscriptions (which would become a waste  of your money).</li>
</ol>
<p>The  only way to engage an indirect channel in an SaaS delivery model is  around  the professional services that must encompass your resolution.  In effect, the only indirect channel  I witnessed  function for SaaS companies  is the value-added service provider partner. This is where  a partner  delivers the business process re-engineering necessary to effectively  implement your solution at a customer site. In that case, the service  provider produces his revenue from the services billed immediately to the  customer&#8230; while producing much less revenue from the SaaS license margin you  would provide  in addition to  that.</p>
<p>Now  the long answer&#8230;<br />&nbsp;<br />Let&#8217;s start with the basics&#8230;&nbsp; There are many sales channels, each with its own characteristics and leverage:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Online sales</strong>:  Marketing and promoting your solution via the internet which includes restricted  phone or physical interaction with customers. Generally, this channel is  augmented by customer support, whose function is centered on replying to  questions and on-boarding customers.</li>
<li><strong>Direct sales</strong>:  Your own sales people interacting with prospects to convert them into  customers.  Several types of direct sales exist,  including inside  phone based sales, and field sales.</li>
<li><strong>Affiliate sales</strong>:  These  are partners who push your online sales. They  represent  more of a  marketing channel, for they normally do not supply any sales support. </li>
<li><strong>Reseller sales</strong>:  Selling through partners who work mostly as a marketing channel.  Typically, these partners do not provide your customers with any  added value other than  the sales transaction. &nbsp; These partners derive  the vast majority of their money through the margin you provide them when  they sell your product. Typically, they expect anywhere from 10-20% in  margin. These partners primarily give favor to installed software providers and   hardware providers. They don&#8217;t  have a lot  to offer an SaaS provider.  Example: Software House.</li>
<li><strong>Value-added reseller</strong>:  These people are partners who provide services wrapped around your  product to provide a more total solution to their customers. These   resellers  create the majority of their revenues through the delivery of  services, rather than the margin you provide them for reselling your  product. Therefore,  it is crucial you show them how they can do so.   Most likely  you will need to actually deliver the service yourself  just before teaching others how to do it.&nbsp; Good VARs will think of  the  customers as their own, and they are  offering you  the privilege to  bring your product to them. For instance: Software Allies delivers services around Salesforce.com implementations.</li>
<li><strong>System integrator</strong>:  These are partners who create more total solutions by integrating  your product with others.  Though  these partners are traditionally focused  on installed software and/or hardware, a few of them are emerging to  assist SaaS solution providers.&nbsp; These partners manufacture the vast majority of  their revenue through  services and little through product resale. </li>
<li><strong>Distributor and Value-added Distributor</strong>:  These  distributors  grant you entry to a pool of resellers or value-added  resellers.  Leverage is the main benefit behind a distributor &#8230; their role is to  lengthen your reach to many probable partners. It is particularly  challenging for SaaS companies to leverage distributors, especially in the  United States. Distributors have a tendency to be a lot more suited for installed  software and hardware vendors.&nbsp; Although, entering European or Asian  countries can be successfully facilitated by value-added distributors.</li>
<li><strong>OEM</strong>:  These partners are typically companies  that have  their own product to sell  and they are looking to expand their offering with your product. For  instance, Salesforce.com announced its AppExhange OEM Edition back in 2006.</li>
</ul>
<p>There  are a handful of more categories of channel sales, but they are simply  variations on the above.&nbsp;  What I am trying to say  is that  channel sales come in all kinds of flavors. You are not able to generalize sales  channels and you need to commit the time to figure out the optimal channel  you should develop.</p>
<p>Let us now  look at  some standard misconceptions about indirect channels:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Leverage</strong>:  &#8220;We have to build indirect channels, otherwise we can&#8217;t scale.&#8221;&nbsp; Maybe.  Maybe not. It is true that indirect channels provide scale.  The trouble  is that indirect channels ordinarily don&#8217;t work for early stage or  <a href="http://www.openviewpartners.com" target="_blank">expansion stage</a> software companies. Early stage software companies basically do not have the brand and scale to push enough revenue  through a partner&#8217;s business.  You will  end up  in  a catch-22&#8230; can&#8217;t  grow enough to get the channel partner&#8217;s attention &#8230; can&#8217;t grow big  enough without the channel.&nbsp; Answer? Plan your development without the  channel and look to develop your channel when you&#8217;re at least $20M in  revenue.</li>
<li><strong>Complexity</strong>: It is much easier and less  expensive to sell via partners than direct sales. Wrong!&nbsp; Building  indirect channels is exceptionally difficult to do, especially for early  stage software companies.&nbsp; Imagine how hard it is to assemble your own  committed sales team. Now envision getting someone else&#8217;s  sales team to  sell your product just as well,  while also promoting 10 other vendor&#8217;s  products. You need to start <a href="http://www.openviewpartners.com" target="_blank">building a sales team</a> first.</li>
<li><strong>Partners will sell your product</strong>:  No they won&#8217;t. At best, they will  market your product by introducing  it  to their existing customers. You will still need  to sell the product  yourself, working through  the partner.  Therefore, for an extended  period of time  (typically a year), you should supply your own sales resources to sell to  your partner&#8217;s customers. Once you close enough  deals, the partner&#8217;s  sales team will begin to feel excited about your product and will start  the process of learning how to sell it.</li>
<li><strong>I should develop a channel for my needs</strong>: Nope&#8230; You should only construct an indirect channel if it suits your customer&#8217;s needs.</li>
</ol>
<p> What  channel  works  best for your product? ASK YOUR CUSTOMERS. Start  by  asking them what  they think a COMPLETE solution entails.  What would they desire  to see delivered with your product to  give them what they need?  What would they like to see when it comes  to integration, deployment,  implementation and training services?&nbsp; Then ask them how  they would like   to see those services delivered. Ask them  the methods in which  they would desire to buy  your product and what service providers they used (or they would have wished to use). These solutions may direct you to possible channels  you can   leverage.&nbsp; If they  said they liked  buying directly from you, and  getting service directly by you, don&#8217;t create an indirect channel.</p>
<p>Until  you make a decision on the appropriate indirect channels, the  type of engagement model  with  the partners, and the nature of the partnership, you do not need to  become bothered  with incentives and channel conflicts.  Begin  with your  customers and then establish a handful of partners who are willing to  take a chance on you.  Approach it as a strategic experiment that  requires  CEO focus. And  keep in mind  that it requires two years to construct an  efficient indirect channel. You are better off  not to  follow that path  if you&#8217;re not ready to  embark on  the two year journey.</p>
<p>Firas Raouf is a Venture Partner at OpenView.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trading-ez.com/the-construction-of-indirect-sales-channels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.trading-ez.com @ 2012-02-06 23:13:37 -->
